<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>simonyoungwriters.com &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonyoungwriters.com/category/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonyoungwriters.com</link>
	<description>Words that connect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s top 10</title>
		<link>http://www.simonyoungwriters.com/jakob-nielsens-top-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonyoungwriters.com/jakob-nielsens-top-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.109/~simonyou/2005/10/04/jakob-nielsens-top-10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[posted by Simon Young 11:36 AM, 4 October 2005 NZDTThe best of the worst are out &#8211; worst web design mistakes, that is. The full list is here, but here&#8217;s my summary:

Legibility problems &#8211; fonts too small or a fixed size.
Non-standard links. Links should look like links. IMHO the worst problem is underlined words that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font class="cgtext_postedby">posted by <a href="http://www.simonyoungwriters.com/User?Action=View&amp;User_id=6" class="cglink_postedby">Simon Young</a> 11:36 AM, 4 October 2005 NZDT</font>The best of the worst are out &#8211; worst web design mistakes, that is. The full list is <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designmistakes.html">here</a>, but here&#8217;s my summary:</p>
<ol>
<li>Legibility problems &#8211; fonts too small or a fixed size.</li>
<li>Non-standard links. Links should look like links. IMHO the worst problem is underlined words that aren&#8217;t links. Confusing.</li>
<li>Flash. &#8220;Flash should not be used to jazz up a page. If your content is boring, rewrite text to make it more compelling and hire a professional photographer to shoot better photos. Don&#8217;t make your pages move. It doesn&#8217;t increase users&#8217; attention, it drives them away.&#8221; Preach it, brother!</li>
<li>Content that&#8217;s not written for the web. But who&#8217;s going to spend the time repurposing content for a website? Hi, I&#8217;m Simon. I do that sort of stuff.</li>
<li>Bad search. A technical problem that&#8217;s becoming more important.</li>
<li>Browser incompatibility. There was a brief window where just about everyone was using Internet Explorer, but now Firefox is really popular, plus a few others. Don&#8217;t shut us &#8220;other&#8221; users out!</li>
<li>Cumbersome forms. Nielsen recommends using an <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/forms.html">application</a> if you need to get lots and lots of information. He also points out one of my biggest bugbears, US sites that require you enter a US Zip code and State &#8211; even if it&#8217;s an international offer. I hate having to say I&#8217;m from Wyoming just because I can&#8217;t say &#8220;Outside US&#8221;</li>
<li>No contact information or other company info. Nuff said. It&#8217;s pretty simple, just look at the left hand sidebar on this site. Nothing too strenuous.</li>
<li>Frozen layouts with fixed page widths. Well, I can&#8217;t argue with the research, and I&#8217;ve chosen to make this site variable width, but I meet a lot of people who argue convincingly for a nice 700-wide border, centred. Looks nice, tidy and professional. But, as Nielsen points out, you&#8217;ll end up horizontal scrolling if you want to have two browser windows open next to each other. Designer&#8217;s answer: get two screens!</li>
<li>Inadequate photo enlargement. Interesting! Especially pertinent to ecommerce, where people want to replicate as closely as possible the experience of picking up the product in the shop. <a href="http://www.trademe.co.nz/">Trademe</a> does this pretty well; individual ecommerce operators need to do this well too.</li>
</ol>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see a list like this, even though much of it is familiar from past years. Sometimes when I meet a designer or client who wants, say, a Flash intro, I forget that not everyone knows this stuff; some people are still stuck in the 90s.</p>
<p>I could be biased and say it&#8217;s all about the words, but mostly it&#8217;s about the customer. Just so happens that the customer is largely guided by words, rather than images, animations or suchlike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonyoungwriters.com/jakob-nielsens-top-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
